Friday, 29 September 2017
Thursday, 28 September 2017
FMV Trailers Are Bullshit
I don't watch a lot of trailers anymore. I can't think of a game with the exception of Persona 5 that I bothered to check out any of the pre release material for. Even a game that I was excited for as Nier Automata I didn't bother to look at trailers for.
So while I was browsing Facebook a trailer for an upcoming game called Extinction appeared on my feed. It was a FMV trailer of a man with a strange choice of wardrobe parkouring through a city killing monsters in a rather bloody and ruthless fashion. Think God of War meets Prince of Persia but the main character looks like Connor McGreggor watched a few too many fantasy movies. What really wound me up that the post and the comments were like "OH MY GOD THIS GAME LOOKS SO COOL!"
It's fine to get excited, it was pretty bombastic but what people seem to forget about watching trailers like this is that they don't actually tell you anything about the game. The trailer looks cool but information about the game is minimal. Nothing about the game play, the most important part of any video GAME, is present. Just a little bit of story and a cool action sequence with a big ogre thing being chopped into little bits.
If you took the time to go and look further into it you'd find that there is in fact some game play footage. Now I'll give you that it's pre alpha so the developers have a lot of time to make it not awful but right now the game looks fucking awful. The kind of thing you'd expect to find at the bottom of a cardboard barrel in a place like CEX along side stuff like Bullet Witch and Asura's Wrath. To me the game play trailer looked a bit like that Attack on Titan game on PS4 just a lot less interesting and combat that's trying really hard to be intricate but really isn't.
I'm not gonna say the game is going to be shit or that trailers aren't worth watching. Just keep in mind that when you do find a trailer and it's entirely an FMV with no information on the actual game, maybe you should take a minute to think about what you just watched before getting all excited. Get excited for the game, not a glorified cutscene.
So while I was browsing Facebook a trailer for an upcoming game called Extinction appeared on my feed. It was a FMV trailer of a man with a strange choice of wardrobe parkouring through a city killing monsters in a rather bloody and ruthless fashion. Think God of War meets Prince of Persia but the main character looks like Connor McGreggor watched a few too many fantasy movies. What really wound me up that the post and the comments were like "OH MY GOD THIS GAME LOOKS SO COOL!"
It's fine to get excited, it was pretty bombastic but what people seem to forget about watching trailers like this is that they don't actually tell you anything about the game. The trailer looks cool but information about the game is minimal. Nothing about the game play, the most important part of any video GAME, is present. Just a little bit of story and a cool action sequence with a big ogre thing being chopped into little bits.
If you took the time to go and look further into it you'd find that there is in fact some game play footage. Now I'll give you that it's pre alpha so the developers have a lot of time to make it not awful but right now the game looks fucking awful. The kind of thing you'd expect to find at the bottom of a cardboard barrel in a place like CEX along side stuff like Bullet Witch and Asura's Wrath. To me the game play trailer looked a bit like that Attack on Titan game on PS4 just a lot less interesting and combat that's trying really hard to be intricate but really isn't.
I'm not gonna say the game is going to be shit or that trailers aren't worth watching. Just keep in mind that when you do find a trailer and it's entirely an FMV with no information on the actual game, maybe you should take a minute to think about what you just watched before getting all excited. Get excited for the game, not a glorified cutscene.
Wednesday, 27 September 2017
Wednesday, 20 September 2017
Eggggg and Illi
Every week a paid app on the app store goes free for a while and I always take the chance to grab that shit because fuck paying money for app games. However sometimes I download a title that makes me feel a little guilty for not directly supporting the creator and while I'm not about to go and pay for a game I already own, I want to highlight a couple of titles I got for free so many you can go and support the better side of the mobile game spectrum.
The first game is Egggg, I'm not sure exactly how many Gs are in there but it's more than usual. Egggg is a two button platform game and the aim is just to get from one end of the stage to the other without dying. The thing is though that once you press a direction button, you can't stop. If you push the way you're running you jump and the other button will make you turn around. While you're running from one end of the stage to the other there are things to collect and little hidden areas of each stage for you to explore which net you stars at the end. Simply finishing a level isn't too much of a challenge but getting 3 stars on a stage will require some strategising. The game also mixes things up every so often by giving you a stage specific mechanic or having you fight a boss but generally just reaching the end of the stage is your only worry. Still, it's a nice, pure little platforming experience and it's the kind of thing you'd easily find on something like Steam for a few pounds but instead its phone exclusive.
EDIT: As soon as I posted this thing I googled Egg and found a Steam page for it and it's "coming soon", so worth buying there if you don't like playing games on a shitty phone screen. Seriously, it's a goodun
The second game I want to talk about briefly is Illi. It's a very simple, cute little platform puzzle game that will eat through your commutes like nothing else. The game play is super simple with each stage being made up of a number of squares or rectangles and you must jump your way to the exit by tapping the screen. Illy moves around each square by himself and which way he falls depends on which side of the cube you're on when you press jump. So press jump on the top and you'll fall down but press it on the right hand side and you'll fall to the left. Illi does not respect the laws of physics. Each stage comes with a number of "quests" which involve collecting a thing, getting to the exit in a certain number of jumps or beating a stage in a certain time and finishing these quests unlocks more levels.
The good thing about Illi compared to other puzzle games I've played is that it's not bullshit difficult like other shitty iPhone games like Cut the Rope. The solutions to certain levels in things like Cut the Rope where there's no way you'd figure that shit out without spending money on a solution fairy or whatever piss me off but Illi has that nice level of challenge sort of similar to Portal. Things that look hard but if you take a moment to think about them carefully are actually quite simple.
I got these games for free but if it wasn't such a stingy piece of shit and someone had told me about them beforehand, I would have easily dropped a few pounds on these titles. So go check them out because instead of complaining about the sorry state of mobile gaming we should be supporting the people who are actually at least TRYING to do a good job.
The first game is Egggg, I'm not sure exactly how many Gs are in there but it's more than usual. Egggg is a two button platform game and the aim is just to get from one end of the stage to the other without dying. The thing is though that once you press a direction button, you can't stop. If you push the way you're running you jump and the other button will make you turn around. While you're running from one end of the stage to the other there are things to collect and little hidden areas of each stage for you to explore which net you stars at the end. Simply finishing a level isn't too much of a challenge but getting 3 stars on a stage will require some strategising. The game also mixes things up every so often by giving you a stage specific mechanic or having you fight a boss but generally just reaching the end of the stage is your only worry. Still, it's a nice, pure little platforming experience and it's the kind of thing you'd easily find on something like Steam for a few pounds but instead its phone exclusive.
EDIT: As soon as I posted this thing I googled Egg and found a Steam page for it and it's "coming soon", so worth buying there if you don't like playing games on a shitty phone screen. Seriously, it's a goodun
The second game I want to talk about briefly is Illi. It's a very simple, cute little platform puzzle game that will eat through your commutes like nothing else. The game play is super simple with each stage being made up of a number of squares or rectangles and you must jump your way to the exit by tapping the screen. Illy moves around each square by himself and which way he falls depends on which side of the cube you're on when you press jump. So press jump on the top and you'll fall down but press it on the right hand side and you'll fall to the left. Illi does not respect the laws of physics. Each stage comes with a number of "quests" which involve collecting a thing, getting to the exit in a certain number of jumps or beating a stage in a certain time and finishing these quests unlocks more levels.
The good thing about Illi compared to other puzzle games I've played is that it's not bullshit difficult like other shitty iPhone games like Cut the Rope. The solutions to certain levels in things like Cut the Rope where there's no way you'd figure that shit out without spending money on a solution fairy or whatever piss me off but Illi has that nice level of challenge sort of similar to Portal. Things that look hard but if you take a moment to think about them carefully are actually quite simple.
I got these games for free but if it wasn't such a stingy piece of shit and someone had told me about them beforehand, I would have easily dropped a few pounds on these titles. So go check them out because instead of complaining about the sorry state of mobile gaming we should be supporting the people who are actually at least TRYING to do a good job.
Saturday, 16 September 2017
Friday, 8 September 2017
The Journalist Skill Debate Again
Cuphead is an upcoming run and gun game coming out soon that I'm fucking excited for. It looks like a cartoon from yesteryear and mixes that with challenging game play similar to things like Contra. It looks awesome and I can't wait to get my hands on it.
However controversy has once again reared its ugly head however this time it has nothing to do with the game itself and more to do with the people playing it. If you remember when DOOM was coming out and a dude called Arthur Gies played it and sucked massive cocks at it? Well it's that AGAIN. People are pissed off (rightly so) that so called industry professionals can't handle a fucking tutorial level and of course gaming press is shooting back by claiming people are over reacting.
I would recommend at this point to go look up the video, it's easy to find but I'm not linking it here because I don't want to give any of the idiots at Venture Beat views on their shit, embarrassing video.
Let me start by saying that I have ZERO respect for games journalism. It seems to be entirely populated by fucking morons who don't know anything about games and are more interested in writing clickbait or sucking corporate cock rather than ACTUALLY helping consumers in any meaningful way. I'm not the only one who holds this view either, go find any thread about the state of video game journalism on social media and you'll see a lot of people repeating that sentiment.
So big question of the day, do video game journalists have to be good at video games?
The quick answer is yes, of course they fucking do. The job of a reviewer or someone reporting on industry goings on is to assist the consumer. Therefore, you MUST know what the fuck your on about or your failing at the most basic facet of your job. No one is asking journalists to be pro gamers winning The International every year or speedrunners with 5 or 6 world records under their belt but we ask that you at least know how to finish the tutorial of any game that you might come across.
Imagine if you were trying to buy a car so you look up reviews of various vehicles. Imagine then you find out that the person reviewing the cars CAN'T FUCKING DRIVE. This is what the Cuphead/DOOM debate is basically all about.
If you are an individual and you make a YouTube video or write a thing for a personal site, it's OK to suck at games or suck at just that one game. For example I don't know shit about sports games so if I gave a scathing awful review or did a terrible gameplay video of the new Fifa and then called it shit, it's clear that it's just one tossers opinion on the sea of piss that is the internet. HOWEVER, if I was writing for a PROFESSIONAL news website in a PROFESSIONAL capacity and then couldn't even finish the most basic stage of a game with like, 2 button controls, of course people are going to question my ability to do the job. In the case of Cuphead it brings into question everything that Dean Takahashi has EVER said because clearly the man lacks the basic motor function to hold a controller properly.
Which leads me to my other point about this. Arthur Gies and Dean Takahashi didn't just show "bad" performances. People can have an off day or just be not particularly geared towards a certain genre, that's fine. These performances were INCOMPETENT. The kind of game play I'd expect from a child who has never touched a game before. No word of a lie, I could give my mother a copy of Cuphead and within 26 minutes she would finish the tutorial level. Even my wife, who doesn't game and who has put in some FANTASTICALLY embarrassing attempts at certain titles would probably finish the fucking TUTORIAL of Cuphead in 26 minutes.
You couple this with all the problems that games journalism has had over the years and now we're at a point where people have a problem trusting these websites. One stupid prick writing for some stupid website Game Revolution said "If one plumber fucks up your taps, do you never hire another plumber?" Which is a fair point in a way but he's missing the bigger picture and generally being an apologetic little bitch. If a plumber fucked up my taps, I'd hire a different plumber FROM A DIFFERENT COMPANY. So we now know that Venture Beat can't be trusted to pick up a control pad without probably choking on it, where am I going to go? Gamespot? IGN? Kotaku? Well these websites are also full of complete bullshit. People are mad because, if we're using the plumber analogy, that ALL the plumbing companies in the towns are staffed ENTIRELY by inept wankers.
You want game news? You want game reviews? There are plenty of enthusiastic individuals on sites like YouTube/Twitch or various blogs and personal websites that you can get your info from? This is ESPECIALLY important if you are into a niche series or niche genre. If you're into dungeon crawling who are you going to trust? Some cunt on IGN who played Grimrock once for 20 minutes and gave it an 8/10 or someone who has been playing games in that genre for fucking YEARS.
Sort your shit games journalism. Maybe if you hired some actual passionate people who aren't borderline brain dead, people wouldn't hate you. Stick to writing about "social issues" for easy clicks and leave the games, to the gamers.
However controversy has once again reared its ugly head however this time it has nothing to do with the game itself and more to do with the people playing it. If you remember when DOOM was coming out and a dude called Arthur Gies played it and sucked massive cocks at it? Well it's that AGAIN. People are pissed off (rightly so) that so called industry professionals can't handle a fucking tutorial level and of course gaming press is shooting back by claiming people are over reacting.
I would recommend at this point to go look up the video, it's easy to find but I'm not linking it here because I don't want to give any of the idiots at Venture Beat views on their shit, embarrassing video.
Let me start by saying that I have ZERO respect for games journalism. It seems to be entirely populated by fucking morons who don't know anything about games and are more interested in writing clickbait or sucking corporate cock rather than ACTUALLY helping consumers in any meaningful way. I'm not the only one who holds this view either, go find any thread about the state of video game journalism on social media and you'll see a lot of people repeating that sentiment.
So big question of the day, do video game journalists have to be good at video games?
The quick answer is yes, of course they fucking do. The job of a reviewer or someone reporting on industry goings on is to assist the consumer. Therefore, you MUST know what the fuck your on about or your failing at the most basic facet of your job. No one is asking journalists to be pro gamers winning The International every year or speedrunners with 5 or 6 world records under their belt but we ask that you at least know how to finish the tutorial of any game that you might come across.
Imagine if you were trying to buy a car so you look up reviews of various vehicles. Imagine then you find out that the person reviewing the cars CAN'T FUCKING DRIVE. This is what the Cuphead/DOOM debate is basically all about.
If you are an individual and you make a YouTube video or write a thing for a personal site, it's OK to suck at games or suck at just that one game. For example I don't know shit about sports games so if I gave a scathing awful review or did a terrible gameplay video of the new Fifa and then called it shit, it's clear that it's just one tossers opinion on the sea of piss that is the internet. HOWEVER, if I was writing for a PROFESSIONAL news website in a PROFESSIONAL capacity and then couldn't even finish the most basic stage of a game with like, 2 button controls, of course people are going to question my ability to do the job. In the case of Cuphead it brings into question everything that Dean Takahashi has EVER said because clearly the man lacks the basic motor function to hold a controller properly.
Which leads me to my other point about this. Arthur Gies and Dean Takahashi didn't just show "bad" performances. People can have an off day or just be not particularly geared towards a certain genre, that's fine. These performances were INCOMPETENT. The kind of game play I'd expect from a child who has never touched a game before. No word of a lie, I could give my mother a copy of Cuphead and within 26 minutes she would finish the tutorial level. Even my wife, who doesn't game and who has put in some FANTASTICALLY embarrassing attempts at certain titles would probably finish the fucking TUTORIAL of Cuphead in 26 minutes.
You couple this with all the problems that games journalism has had over the years and now we're at a point where people have a problem trusting these websites. One stupid prick writing for some stupid website Game Revolution said "If one plumber fucks up your taps, do you never hire another plumber?" Which is a fair point in a way but he's missing the bigger picture and generally being an apologetic little bitch. If a plumber fucked up my taps, I'd hire a different plumber FROM A DIFFERENT COMPANY. So we now know that Venture Beat can't be trusted to pick up a control pad without probably choking on it, where am I going to go? Gamespot? IGN? Kotaku? Well these websites are also full of complete bullshit. People are mad because, if we're using the plumber analogy, that ALL the plumbing companies in the towns are staffed ENTIRELY by inept wankers.
You want game news? You want game reviews? There are plenty of enthusiastic individuals on sites like YouTube/Twitch or various blogs and personal websites that you can get your info from? This is ESPECIALLY important if you are into a niche series or niche genre. If you're into dungeon crawling who are you going to trust? Some cunt on IGN who played Grimrock once for 20 minutes and gave it an 8/10 or someone who has been playing games in that genre for fucking YEARS.
Sort your shit games journalism. Maybe if you hired some actual passionate people who aren't borderline brain dead, people wouldn't hate you. Stick to writing about "social issues" for easy clicks and leave the games, to the gamers.
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
Video Games, the Olympics and stupidity
I think anyone who has even a passing interest in video games is aware of how much of a thing e-sports have become. Most people are familiar with the big competitive games like League of Legends or Starcraft 2. You probably have heard of certain big events such as Dreamhack in Sweden or the EVO fighting game tournament just to name a couple.
E-Sports have become so much of a thing that they are now being broadcast on TV the same way you'd broadcast any other sports. When I was living in Sweden a few years ago I watched the Dreamhack Starcraft 2 tournament on the TV as it was happening live and on the plane to Rome two videos under the "TV Shows" section of the entertainment were finals from a DotA2 and Hearthstone tournament.
I think even ESPN are showing LoL, DotA and Hearthstone on TV and we also have Twitch which is basically the place to go for live feeds of tournaments so it's safe to say that the e-sports scene has come a fair way.
Then I hear that there's been talk of putting e-sports in the Olympics which is an interesting topic for discussion. I can totally see why some would see e-sports having a rightful place in the Olympics but I can also understand why some people wouldn't want them there either. But that's not what I'm here to talk about with this post.
This is Thomas Bach, the president of the International Olympic Committee. If you take a quick look at his Wikipedia page you can clearly see he's a well educated man and some kind of ex-fencing beast that took home a gold medal in 1976. But just because he's got some decent academics and can wield a foil like a pro doesn't make him immune from saying some of the stupidest shit I've ever heard in my life. Here's a quote
“We want to promote non-discrimination, non-violence, and peace among people, This doesn’t match with video games, which are about violence, explosions and killing. And there we have to draw a clear line.”
[Source: https://www.sporttechie.com/no-violent-video-games-in-the-olympics-says-ioc-president/ ]
What in the name of fuck is wrong with this guy. Video games are about violence, explosions and killing? This is the kind of stupid statement I expect to hear from my elderly relatives that barely know what a computer even is, not the head of the IOC. There are good arguments for and against putting e-sports in the Olympics like I said before but games being "violent" isn't one of them.
The olympic is host to a number of combat sports which could be seen as violent. I mean this guy making this statement used to be a fucking Fencer. I could easily make some kind of ignorant bullshit comment like him and say something like "We want to promote non-discrimination, non-violence, and peace among people, this doesn't match with fencing which is just stabbing and slashing at folks with bits of metal"
It sounds to me like Mr Bach is just an old, ignorant man who has a tired old view of gaming and doesn't want to do ANY research on the topic and expand his knowledge on the topic. Go and watch any kind of analytical video on a game like Starcraft, Street Fighter or Counter Strike and you can easily see that there's so much more going on that just "violence, killing and explosions".
There's no place in 2017 for stupid, ignorant and misguided comments like that. Should video games be in the event? I don't know, but should they be disregarded entirely because of "violence"? Hell no and that idea is so fantastically fucking stupid that my head might just explode violently and kill me in reaction to reading something that dumb.
E-Sports have become so much of a thing that they are now being broadcast on TV the same way you'd broadcast any other sports. When I was living in Sweden a few years ago I watched the Dreamhack Starcraft 2 tournament on the TV as it was happening live and on the plane to Rome two videos under the "TV Shows" section of the entertainment were finals from a DotA2 and Hearthstone tournament.
I think even ESPN are showing LoL, DotA and Hearthstone on TV and we also have Twitch which is basically the place to go for live feeds of tournaments so it's safe to say that the e-sports scene has come a fair way.
Then I hear that there's been talk of putting e-sports in the Olympics which is an interesting topic for discussion. I can totally see why some would see e-sports having a rightful place in the Olympics but I can also understand why some people wouldn't want them there either. But that's not what I'm here to talk about with this post.
This is Thomas Bach, the president of the International Olympic Committee. If you take a quick look at his Wikipedia page you can clearly see he's a well educated man and some kind of ex-fencing beast that took home a gold medal in 1976. But just because he's got some decent academics and can wield a foil like a pro doesn't make him immune from saying some of the stupidest shit I've ever heard in my life. Here's a quote
“We want to promote non-discrimination, non-violence, and peace among people, This doesn’t match with video games, which are about violence, explosions and killing. And there we have to draw a clear line.”
[Source: https://www.sporttechie.com/no-violent-video-games-in-the-olympics-says-ioc-president/ ]
What in the name of fuck is wrong with this guy. Video games are about violence, explosions and killing? This is the kind of stupid statement I expect to hear from my elderly relatives that barely know what a computer even is, not the head of the IOC. There are good arguments for and against putting e-sports in the Olympics like I said before but games being "violent" isn't one of them.
The olympic is host to a number of combat sports which could be seen as violent. I mean this guy making this statement used to be a fucking Fencer. I could easily make some kind of ignorant bullshit comment like him and say something like "We want to promote non-discrimination, non-violence, and peace among people, this doesn't match with fencing which is just stabbing and slashing at folks with bits of metal"
It sounds to me like Mr Bach is just an old, ignorant man who has a tired old view of gaming and doesn't want to do ANY research on the topic and expand his knowledge on the topic. Go and watch any kind of analytical video on a game like Starcraft, Street Fighter or Counter Strike and you can easily see that there's so much more going on that just "violence, killing and explosions".
There's no place in 2017 for stupid, ignorant and misguided comments like that. Should video games be in the event? I don't know, but should they be disregarded entirely because of "violence"? Hell no and that idea is so fantastically fucking stupid that my head might just explode violently and kill me in reaction to reading something that dumb.
Labels:
Bullshit,
E-Sports,
Events,
explosions,
IOC,
killing,
Olympics,
Sports,
Tokyo 2020,
Violence
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)